Do I get that right: #Aerosol & #ECS & #HadCM3

This is basically a modified version of some earlier tweets.

Let me see whether I can delineate the “Aerosol forcing too high” thus “models too hot” argument:

If Nic Lewis’ value/range for aerosol forcing is correct then HadCM3 appears to be incompatible with observationally constraint estimates (see Figure B.1 in this pdf). These inferences are made from Harris et al.’s (2013) PPE results. That is HadCM3 is very unlikely to have a low climate sensitivity for such (low) values of aerosol forcing.

Therefrom it is concluded that models generally are likely to run too hot.

Is that about correct?



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.