What is the relevant question to be asked? What do we need to debate?
Is it: Is the science correct?
Is it: Are the conclusions drawn from the science correct? That is: the ‘narrative’.
Or is it: Which risks are we willing to take?
I see discussions on the first.
There are certainly different views on the implications of the scientific findings. The participants in the debate disagree on the narrative.
But are we putting enough effort in the arguments and the discussion of acceptable risks and how to weigh different kinds of risks? My subjective impression is this is not adequately discussed. Statements are issued but beyond that?